What will really count is if/when a judge says no, you don't unless you have proof that they were/did-intend to steal signal.
I almost bought one of these, not to steal signal - I intended just to install in my PC and copy my own card just so I could 1) watch on monitor in real time rather than craning my head when something interesting comes on, and 2) to time shift movies I was interested in watching. To do all that now I'd need to buy a tivo and a tuner card, and I felt heck, why not just one?
The only reason I didn't is that I read that the software was quirky to set up and I have enough quirky software to deal with and have been using my main Linux box for real work and didn't want to destabilize it. Then I just forgot it.
If I had carried through would I have gotten one of these nasties from DirectTV? What would be the point since I needed a receiver for the family room anyway? Just another instance of corporate america run rampant.
-- TWZ
~ Merkey v The Internet et al Docs ~ Yahoeuvre ~ tuxrocks.com (SCO cases legal docs) ~ scofacts.org ~ eagle.petrofsky.org ~ Zen's Den ~ Yahoo SCOX Message Board ~ Lamlaw ~ Microsoft Watch ~ Groklaw ~ Korgwal - a Groklaw mirror ~ nosoftwarepatents.com ~ Flame Warriors ~ SCOXE Wars ~ Get your Merkey Number here! ~ Digital Law Online
Make a new account