IP-WARS.NET || Comments || OSRM: Please Clear Up Some Confusion!

OSRM: Please Clear Up Some Confusion! | 69 comments (69 topical, editorial, 5 hidden)

Re: PJ's comment policy (4.00 / 5) (#28)
by heimdal31 (heimdal31_ip_warsNO@SPAM.threenorth.com) on Fri Nov 12th, 2004 at 16:12:40 EST
(User Info) http://www.threenorth.com/sco

They do give a valid reason for being vague about identifying the exact patents. Doing so would expose whoever was aware of them to treble damages in patent litigation.

For more on this, see an article on this topic at GrokLine.

Brief teaser:

<<Proving "willfulness" is in actual practice easier for plaintiffs than you might think. If the plaintiff can prove that defendant had knowledge of the patent and continued to practice it, the burden shifts to the defendant to present evidence rebutting the presumption of willfulness.>>

---Tim Rushing
[ Parent ]

Re: PJ's comment policy by mikey, 11/12/2004 16:54:25 EST (4.28 / 7)

Please note - Retraction by mikey, 11/13/2004 12:30:52 EST (4.50 / 6)

Re: Please note - Retraction by mikey, 11/13/2004 12:55:13 EST (4.00 / 5)
Re: Please note - Retraction by mitmosnar, 11/14/2004 00:26:27 EST (3.28 / 7)

Re: Please note - Retraction by mikey, 11/14/2004 00:40:09 EST (3.50 / 4)

Re: Please note - Retraction by mitmosnar, 11/14/2004 01:12:36 EST (3.50 / 4)

Careful by Potential Recruit, 11/14/2004 01:22:11 EST (4.00 / 6)

Re: Careful by mikey, 11/14/2004 13:52:58 EST (3.66 / 3)

Re: Careful by Potential Recruit, 11/14/2004 18:18:34 EST (3.66 / 3)

Re: Careful by mikey, 11/14/2004 18:47:56 EST (3.80 / 5)

Re: Careful by mitmosnar, 11/14/2004 21:43:25 EST (3.00 / 5)

Re: Careful by mikey, 11/14/2004 21:59:09 EST (3.50 / 4)

Re: PJ's comment policy by heimdal31, 11/12/2004 17:12:52 EST (4.40 / 5)

Re: PJ's comment policy by ColonelZen, 11/12/2004 17:29:47 EST (4.40 / 5)

OSRM policies by heimdal31, 11/12/2004 18:00:48 EST (4.60 / 5)

Re: OSRM policies by ColonelZen, 11/13/2004 01:01:51 EST (4.57 / 7)

Re: PJ's comment policy by mikey, 11/12/2004 18:03:13 EST (4.00 / 6)

Re: PJ's comment policy by infosecgroupie, 11/13/2004 13:18:04 EST (3.66 / 6)

OSRM: Please Clear Up Some Confusion! | 69 comments (69 topical, 0 editorial, 5 hidden)

Recent Diaries

SCO has a Potential and Credible BILLION Dollar Liability
by ColonelZen - March 15

The Chinese Room Revisited, Thoughts on Consciousness
by ColonelZen - November 24
1 comment

Advocacy
by br3n - October 29
3 comments

An IPOWER ful experience
by ColonelZen - September 25
6 comments

Learning C#
by ColonelZen - September 23
1 comment

Getting ruby DBI for Mysql and Postgresql working on FC 6
by ColonelZen - March 7

Declaration of Linus Torvalds
by nedu - February 13
1 comment

Declaration of M. Douglas McIlroy
by nedu - February 12
6 comments

Declaration of Ulrich Drepper
by nedu - February 11
1 comment

Declaration of K. Y. Srinivasan
by nedu - February 11

More Diaries...

Login

Make a new account

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies or owners.
Comments, articles and logbooks are owned by the Poster. By posting on the ip-wars.net web site, all posters grant a license to ip-wars.net to publish the content and release it pursuant to the Creative Commons License that covers the rest of the site. For more details, please check out the Standard Operating Procedures. Also, please read the Privacy Policy for the site. Finally, DO NOT send e-mail to the site owner (Jeff Causey) unless you have read and agree to the terms regarding e-mail included in the Standard Operating Procedures.
Everything else � 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 ip-wars.net and Jeffrey G. Causey and is licensed under a

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Links

Recent Comments

Recent Diaries

Login