Comment Ratings by jbellis

2) Re: Censorship on IPW??? [3.60], by Potential Recruit, Rated: 3
Posted on 06/28/2006 08:05:17 EST
Rated on 08/04/2006 09:00:13 EST

3) Re: Censorship on IPW??? [3.25], by AncientBrit, Rated: 3
Posted on 06/27/2006 20:19:31 EST
Rated on 08/04/2006 08:59:34 EST

4) Re: Censorship on IPW??? [4.00], by ColonelZen, Rated: 2
Posted on 06/29/2006 23:57:27 EST
Rated on 08/04/2006 08:59:07 EST

5) Re: Censorship on IPW??? [3.60], by JCausey, Rated: 3
Posted on 06/28/2006 10:20:36 EST
Rated on 08/04/2006 08:58:41 EST

6) Re: Censorship on IPW??? [3.60], by sphealey, Rated: 3
Posted on 06/27/2006 15:37:50 EST
Rated on 08/04/2006 08:58:34 EST

7) Censorship on IPW??? [3.80], by AncientBrit, Rated: 3
Posted on 06/26/2006 20:09:31 EST
Rated on 08/04/2006 08:57:48 EST

8) Re: A Merkey Lurkey Letter [4.37], by Sunny, Rated: 5
Posted on 08/15/2005 11:10:46 EST
Rated on 08/27/2005 14:20:18 EST

9) Re: I'm Back (with a possible solution) [1.41], by Potential Recruit, Rated: 1
Posted on 03/24/2005 00:09:48 EST
Rated on 03/30/2005 09:08:49 EST

10) Re: Whatever Happened To Whatever [3.00], by tintak, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/16/2004 19:13:22 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 20:17:05 EST

11) Two in one day. [1.35], by Potential Recruit, Rated: 1
Posted on 12/16/2004 19:13:53 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 19:37:30 EST

12) Re: Meta: Insanity? [1.70], by Potential Recruit, Rated: 1
Posted on 12/16/2004 19:12:56 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 19:34:59 EST

13) Re: rating meta note [3.00], by Potential Recruit, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/16/2004 19:08:57 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 19:11:26 EST

14) rating meta note [3.50], by ColonelZen, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/16/2004 18:29:31 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 19:11:22 EST

15) Re: OO developers response? [2.90], by Potential Recruit, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/16/2004 17:00:23 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 17:37:03 EST

16) Re: OO developers response? [3.00], by br3n, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/16/2004 15:51:42 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 17:36:45 EST

17) PJ is INSANE. [1.10], by Potential Recruit, Rated: 0
Posted on 12/16/2004 16:47:22 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 17:36:08 EST

18) Re: OO developers response? [1.00], by Potential Recruit, Rated: 1
Posted on 12/16/2004 16:48:15 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 17:35:43 EST

19) Re: we cross-posted LOL [3.00], by John Douglas, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/16/2004 16:26:48 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 17:33:37 EST

20) we cross-posted LOL [3.10], by Potential Recruit, Rated: 4
Posted on 12/16/2004 15:46:45 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 17:33:22 EST

21) Re: OO developers response? Reply Part 2 [3.37], by John Douglas, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/16/2004 15:30:14 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 17:32:54 EST

22) Re: OO developers response? [3.57], by br3n, Rated: 4
Posted on 12/16/2004 17:06:43 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 17:30:21 EST

23) Re: OO developers response? [1.27], by Potential Recruit, Rated: 1
Posted on 12/16/2004 16:54:55 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 17:29:38 EST

24) Re: OO developers response? [3.80], by br3n, Rated: 4
Posted on 12/16/2004 15:49:26 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 17:28:56 EST

25) Re: OO developers response? [3.81], by John Douglas, Rated: 4
Posted on 12/16/2004 15:01:08 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 17:27:33 EST

26) Re: Whatever Happened To Whatever [4.00], by pgk, Rated: 4
Posted on 12/16/2004 08:27:38 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 17:26:38 EST

27) [Hidden Comment]

28) Re: OO developers response? [3.55], by pgk, Rated: 4
Posted on 12/16/2004 14:41:23 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 14:47:06 EST

29) Re: OO developers response? [3.33], by Potential Recruit, Rated: 4
Posted on 12/16/2004 14:05:06 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 14:46:54 EST

30) Re: Superman flies home (maybe) [3.20], by codswallet, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/16/2004 11:13:36 EST
Rated on 12/16/2004 12:08:32 EST